Holistic vs. Analytic Evaluation in Writing Test of Eighth Grade Students
نویسندگان
چکیده
The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy holistic and analytic scoring rubrics when applied context writing examinations. Throughout research, a technique was utilized compare two grading models based on (a) assessor agreement (reliability) (b) reasons for grades given (validity). Teachers were randomly allocated one conditions, where they graded same student performance using either an analytical or approach. design experimental. Agreement rank correlation between have been compared. A comparison students' assignment made in both rubrics. information gathered from twenty-four students eighth grade at SMP N 5 Kecamatan Kapur IX. authors conducted analysis rubrics, psychometric statistics, order precisely determine strengths weaknesses students, place them along continuum foreign language ability. Citation In contrast, placed examinees scale competency that more specifically defined. As result, dependable than it came gauging achieving goals.
منابع مشابه
Effect of Holistic vs. Analytic Assessment on Improving Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Skill
In assessing foreign language writing, holistic and analytic scoring can be used to measure a variety of discourse and linguistic features. This study aimed to investigate the possible significant effect of analyt- ic and holistic assessments on improving writing skill among Iranian EFL learners. For this purpose, two groups of intermediate EFL learners, after being homogenized, were divided in...
متن کاملeffect of holistic vs. analytic assessment on improving iranian intermediate efl learners’ writing skill
in assessing foreign language writing, holistic and analytic scoring can be used to measure a variety of discourse and linguistic features. this study aimed to investigate the possible significant effect of analyt- ic and holistic assessments on improving writing skill among iranian efl learners. for this purpose, two groups of intermediate efl learners, after being homogenized, were divided in...
متن کاملUsing PEGWriting to Support the Writing Motivation and Writing Quality of Eighth-Grade Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study
A quasi-experimental study compared the effects of feedback condition on eighth-grade students’ writing motivation and writing achievement. Four classes of eighth-graders were assigned to a combined feedback condition in which they received feedback on their writing from their teacher and from an automated essay evaluation (AEE) system called PEGWriting®. Four other eighth-grade classes were as...
متن کاملthe effects of collaborative strategic reading and direct instruction in persuasion on iranian second grade of high school students persuasive writing and attitudes
this study examined the effects of collaborative strategic reading and direct instruction in persuasion on iranian high school students persuasive writing and attitudes. students in three intact classes were assigned to one of three treatment conditions: collaborative strategic reading and direct instruction in persuasion or direct instruction in persuasion or a control group. treatment effects...
Characteristics of divergent mathematical thinking in eighth grade students
This research examined the characteristics of eighth grade students who exhibited divergent mathematical thinking during problem solving. Divergent mathematical thinking is defined as creative, efficient, and accurate engagement in the cognitive processes of reasoning, problem-solving, communicating, representing, and proof. Using modified talk-aloud protocols, real-time naturalistic analysis o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of English language studies
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2541-5131', '2527-7022']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v7i2.16422